|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place Scrutiny Committee
|
19 May 2026 |
|
Report of the Head of Democratic Services
|
|
Task and Finish Group Review into Section 106 Agreements Process Improvements
Summary
1. This report seeks the Committee’s agreement to the proposed remit (Annex A) of a Task and Finish Group review into process improvements in relation to Section 106 Agreements.
Background
2. Section 106 agreements are legally binding agreements entered into between a local planning authority and a property owner as part of the planning process in order to mitigate the impacts of new development and to make development acceptable which would otherwise be unacceptable in planning terms. City of York Council is responsible for managing and monitoring all active Section 106 agreements within its administrative area.
4. The Motion called for a cross-party group to be set up to look at improvements to the Section 106 process, including five specific objectives as detailed below.
5. It is proposed that this group should take the form of a Task and Finish Group reporting to the Place Scrutiny Committee.
Aim and Objectives
6. The agreed Council motion specified five objectives for the Group as below:
· Share details and discuss the existing review of outstanding S106 money and the plans to spend it (and absolutely ensure any risk of it needing to return it to developers is minimised)
· Improving the process of ensuring all consultees respond to S106 enquiries (noting for example a notable number of large applications which have received no NHS response)
· Creating a system for ward members to identify their ward priorities in the different categories of s106 contributions (in which there is discretion i.e. not education, early years places etc) to inform officers when drafting s106 agreements;
· Ensuring the monitoring of S106 agreements is rigorous and breaches are swiftly acted upon.
· Ensuring that the monies received are spent as promptly as possible to deliver the mitigations / benefits they are for, and that there is a clear monitoring system for this.
7. Consultation has taken place with the Council’s internal auditor, Veritau. Veritau is currently undertaking an audit of the controls in place around Section 106 Agreements, including around ensuring there are appropriate safeguards to the Council in the use of developer contributions; a cohesive framework and records management; that Section 106 contributions are appropriately drawn down for spending; and transparency in reporting on funds held against Section 106 obligations.
8. Further consultation will take place with a view to ensuring the Task and Finish Group review is complementary to this audit and avoids any duplication of work.
9. Methods will include desk-based work and consultation with relevant Council officers, including from the Planning and Finance teams.
Timeframe
10. It is proposed that the Group’s work is carried out over spring and summer 2026, with a view to presenting a final report to the Committee in September 2026.
11. As establishing the group has already been approved by Council, the options available for Members at this stage are either endorse or suggest amendments to the proposed remit of the Task and Finish Group.
Council Plan
12. As Section 106 agreements can be used to support the provision of services and infrastructure, the proposed work has relevance for all seven of the Council’s key priorities, as set out in the Council Plan 2023-27 (One City, for all).
13. There are no direct implications to be addressed at this stage in the process. Any relevant implications will be identified by the Task and Finish Group during their review.
Risk Management
11. Any identified risks associated with the findings from this review will be included in the draft final report arising from this review.
12.
The Committee is asked to endorse
the proposed remit, objectives, and timeframe for a Task and Finish
Group review into Section 106
Agreements Process Improvements.
Reason: To enable the
Task and Finish Group to proceed with work on the agreed review,
towards fulfilment of the motion agreed by Council in September
2025 on Planning Process Improvements.
Contact Details
|
Author: |
Chief Officer Responsible for the report:
|
|||||||
James ParkerScrutiny OfficerDemocratic Services
|
Julie GallagherHead of Democratic Services
|
|||||||
|
Report Approved |
√ |
Date |
11 May 2026 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Wards Affected: |
All |
√ |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
For further information please contact the author of the report |
|
|||||||
Background Papers:
Minutes of Full Council meeting, 18 September 2025 https://democracy.york.gov.uk/documents/g15002/Printed%20minutes%20Thursday%2018-Sep-2025%2018.30%20Council.pdf?T=1
City of York Council information on developer contributions
https://www.york.gov.uk/planning-advice-guidance/developer-contributions
Annex A – Task and Finish Group Proposed Remit
List of Abbreviations Used in this Report
None